Coastal Power Products, Inc. v. Daytona Marina & Boat Works

357 So. 2d 473, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15721
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 18, 1978·No. No. HH-416·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Coastal Power, a third party defendant, seeks interlocutory review from the trial court’s denial of the motion to dismiss for lack of venue. The order is affirmed, there having been no manifest inconvenience, and therefore abuse of discretion, shown. State of Florida, Department of Transportation v. San Marco Contracting Company, 355 So.2d 133 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Dorr-Oliver, Inc. v. Linder Industrial Machinery Co., 263 So.2d 237 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972); Mosby and Russell Engineering Associates, Inc. v. Hudson Company of Florida, 299 So.2d 53 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); Keller Building Products of Sarasota, Inc. v. Pan American Aluminum Corp., 347 So.2d 728 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977).

AFFIRMED.

MILLS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coastal Power Products, Inc. v. Daytona Marina & Boat Works, 357 So. 2d 473, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15721 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

357 So. 2d 473 (Coastal Power Products, Inc. v. Daytona Marina & Boat Works) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dorr-Oliver, Inc. v. Linder Industrial MacHinery Co.
263 So. 2d 237 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)
STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. San Marco Cont. Co.
355 So. 2d 133 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Mosby & Russell Engineering Associates, Inc. v. Hudson Co.
299 So. 2d 53 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Keller Building Products of Sarasota, Inc. v. Pan American Aluminum Corp.
347 So. 2d 728 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)