Coastal Power Products, Inc. v. Daytona Marina & Boat Works

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Coastal Power Products, Inc. v. Daytona Marina & Boat Works

357 So. 2d 473, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15721

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 18, 1978

DocketNo. HH-416

StatusPublished

This text of 357 So. 2d 473 (Coastal Power Products, Inc. v. Daytona Marina & Boat Works) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coastal Power Products, Inc. v. Daytona Marina & Boat Works, 357 So. 2d 473, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15721 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Coastal Power, a third party defendant, seeks interlocutory review from the trial court’s denial of the motion to dismiss for lack of venue. The order is affirmed, there having been no manifest inconvenience, and therefore abuse of discretion, shown. State of Florida, Department of Transportation v. San Marco Contracting Company, 355 So.2d 133 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Dorr-Oliver, Inc. v. Linder Industrial Machinery Co., 263 So.2d 237 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972); Mosby and Russell Engineering Associates, Inc. v. Hudson Company of Florida, 299 So.2d 53 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); Keller Building Products of Sarasota, Inc. v. Pan American Aluminum Corp., 347 So.2d 728 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977).

AFFIRMED.

MILLS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Coastal Power, a third party defendant, seeks interlocutory review from the trial court’s denial of the motion to dismiss for lack of venue. The order is affirmed, there having been no manifest inconvenience, and therefore abuse of discretion, shown. State of Florida, Department of Transportation v. San Marco Contracting Company, 355 So.2d 133 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Dorr-Oliver, Inc. v. Linder Industrial Machinery Co., 263 So.2d 237 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972); Mosby and Russell Engineering Associates, Inc. v. Hudson Company of Florida, 299 So.2d 53 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); Keller Building Products of Sarasota, Inc. v. Pan American Aluminum Corp., 347 So.2d 728 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977).

AFFIRMED.

MILLS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

357 So. 2d 473, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coastal-power-products-inc-v-daytona-marina-boat-works-fladistctapp-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack