Morton v. Hall

118 Mass. 511, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 417
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 22, 1875·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Gray, C. J.

The judge who tried the case without a jury, and to whose decision on questions of fact no exception lies, was warranted in finding, as matter of fact, that by the understanding and agreement of all parties — the plaintiffs, holding the second mortgage, Babbitt, who held the first mortgage and acted as auctioneer at the sale, and the purchaser—the whole estate, and not merely the right of redeeming the land from the first mortgage, was put up, bid for, sold and conveyed; and, upon such finding, in ruling as matter of law that the mortgage to Babbitt was to be first paid out of the proceeds. White v. Whitney, 3 Met. 81, 86. Abby v. Fuller, 8 Met. 36. Church v. Savage, 7 Cush. 440. Alden v. Wilkins, 117 Mass. 216. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morton v. Hall, 118 Mass. 511, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 417 (Mass. 1875).

118 Mass. 511 (Morton v. Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Kenneth Olsen
515 F.2d 1269 (First Circuit, 1975)
In re Worden
107 F. Supp. 496 (W.D. Kentucky, 1952)
Dunbar v. Patrick
9 N.E.2d 308 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1937)
Horr v. Herrington
1908 OK 226 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1908)
Seldner
1 Davis. L. Ct. Cas. 41 (Massachusetts Land Court, 1900)
Union Institution for Savings v. Hill
29 N.E. 219 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1885)
Donohue v. Chase
130 Mass. 137 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1881)
Skilton v. Roberts
129 Mass. 306 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1880)
Cook v. Basley
123 Mass. 396 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1877)