Morton v. Hall
This text of 118 Mass. 511 (Morton v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judge who tried the case without a jury, and to whose decision on questions of fact no exception lies, was warranted in finding, as matter of fact, that by the understanding and agreement of all parties — the plaintiffs, holding the second mortgage, Babbitt, who held the first mortgage and acted as auctioneer at the sale, and the purchaser—the whole estate, and not merely the right of redeeming the land from the first mortgage, was put up, bid for, sold and conveyed; and, upon such finding, in ruling as matter of law that the mortgage to Babbitt was to be first paid out of the proceeds. White v. Whitney, 3 Met. 81, 86. Abby v. Fuller, 8 Met. 36. Church v. Savage, 7 Cush. 440. Alden v. Wilkins, 117 Mass. 216. Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
118 Mass. 511, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morton-v-hall-mass-1875.