Cook v. Basley

123 Mass. 396, 1877 Mass. LEXIS 304
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided November 26, 1877·Published·Cited by 19 cases

Opinion

Gray, C. J.

Upon a sale under a power contained in a mortgage of real estate, the proceeds belong to those who owned the legal title before the sale; and the mortgagee making the sale is bound, after deducting the amount of his own mortgage debt, with the costs and expenses of the sale, to pay the surplus remaining in his hands to the mortgagor or his assigns, according to their respective titles. Where the rights claimed under the mortgagor, subject to the mortgage, have been acquired by attachment and execution against him, difficulties may arise as to the form of remedy. But where those rights have been created by his conveyance, either absolute or in mortgage, the morfc[397] gagee making the sale, and holding a surplus in his hands, is liable to such assigns of the mortgagor, according to their respective interests, in the ordinary action for money had and received. Buttrick v. Wentworth, 6 Allen, 79. Varnum v. Meserve, 8 Allen, 158. Gardner v. Barnes, 106 Mass. 505. Wiggin v. Heywood, 118 Mass. 514. Cranson v. Ockington, 118 Mass. 409.

The fact that the defendant, instead of selling the title mortgaged to him, subject to prior mortgages, sold the entire title in the land, does not affect the case; because that course might lawfully be, and is assumed by the report and the argument to have been, taken with the assent of the prior mortgagees, and the report shows that the fund in the defendant’s hands is sufficient to pay them also. O’ Connell v. Kelly, 114 Mass. 97. Alden v. Wilkins, 117 Mass. 216. Morton v. Hall, 118 Mass. 511.

Judgment on the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cook v. Basley, 123 Mass. 396, 1877 Mass. LEXIS 304 (Mass. 1877).

123 Mass. 396 (Cook v. Basley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. Newburyport Five Cents Savings Bank
41 N.E.2d 188 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1942)
Dunbar v. Patrick
9 N.E.2d 308 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1937)
Thomas v. Haines
188 N.E. 621 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1933)
Brooks v. Bennett
177 N.E. 685 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1931)
Chute v. Cronin
174 N.E. 722 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1930)
Goldman v. Damon
172 N.E. 226 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1930)
Dow v. Bradley
85 A. 896 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1913)
Knowles v. Sullivan
65 N.E. 389 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1902)
Seldner
1 Davis. L. Ct. Cas. 41 (Massachusetts Land Court, 1900)
Moss v. Robertson
77 N.W. 403 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1898)
Yager v. Exchange National Bank
72 N.W. 211 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1897)
Mattel v. Conant
31 N.E. 487 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1892)
Tompkins v. Drennen
95 Ala. 463 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1891)
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Caldwell
6 N.E. 737 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1886)
Brown v. Crookston Agricultural Ass'n
26 N.W. 907 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1886)
Reynolds v. Hennessy
2 A. 701 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1886)
Fussell v. Hennessy
14 R.I. 550 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1884)
Donohue v. Chase
130 Mass. 137 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1881)
Skilton v. Roberts
129 Mass. 306 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1880)