Mortimer v. Grodsky

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided December 22, 2022·No. 1:22-cv-06926·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KIMMORTIMER. SSS

Plaintiff, -against- 22 CIVIL 6926 (LJL) JUDGMENT SCOTT GRODSKY et al., Defendants. wenn K It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated December 21, 2022, and the Court’s Order dated September 6, 2022, the Court has dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. No amended complaint has been filed in this action. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status 1s denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue); accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York December 22, 2022

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerkof Court BY: HK MANGO Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mortimer v. Grodsky, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Mortimer v. Grodsky (Mortimer v. Grodsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)