Morrow v. State

101 S.E. 756, 24 Ga. App. 550, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 923
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Morrow v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 22 Ga. App. 253
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 9, 1919·No. 10966·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. Where several rulings are complained of in a bill of exceptions in a criminal case, and where no exceptions pendente lite were filed, the reviewing court can consider only those rulings that were made within twenty days of the tendering of the bill of exceptions. Regopoulas v. State, 115 Ga. 232 (1) (41 S. E. 619). Under this ruling the assignment of error in the bill of exceptions upon the overruling of the defendant’s plea in abatement can not be considered.

2. The other assignments of error, not having been argued in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, are treated as abandoned.

Judgment affirmed.

LuJce and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morrow v. State, 101 S.E. 756, 24 Ga. App. 550, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 923 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

101 S.E. 756 (Morrow v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Regopoulas v. State
41 S.E. 619 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)