Morrow v. State

101 S.E. 756, 24 Ga. App. 550, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 923
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 9, 1919
Docket10966
StatusPublished

This text of 101 S.E. 756 (Morrow v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morrow v. State, 101 S.E. 756, 24 Ga. App. 550, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 923 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. Where several rulings are complained of in a bill of exceptions in a criminal case, and where no exceptions pendente lite were filed, the reviewing court can consider only those rulings that were made within twenty days of the tendering of the bill of exceptions. Regopoulas v. State, 115 Ga. 232 (1) (41 S. E. 619). Under this ruling the assignment of error in the bill of exceptions upon the overruling of the defendant’s plea in abatement can not be considered.

2. The other assignments of error, not having been argued in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, are treated as abandoned.

Judgment affirmed.

LuJce and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Regopoulas v. State
41 S.E. 619 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 S.E. 756, 24 Ga. App. 550, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morrow-v-state-gactapp-1919.