Morrow v. State

95 S.E. 934, 22 Ga. App. 253, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 280
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 1, 1918
Docket9563
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 95 S.E. 934 (Morrow v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morrow v. State, 95 S.E. 934, 22 Ga. App. 253, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 280 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Bloodwokth, J.

1. Under the oft-repeated rulings of. this court and of the Supreme Court that each ground of a motion for a new trial must he complete and understandable without resorting to an examination of the brief of the evidence or of any other part of the record, the first ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial in this case will not be considered. Southern Ry. Co. v. Williams, 19 Ga. App. 544 (4) (91 S. E. 1001); Smiley v. Smiley, 144 Ga. 546 (87 S. E. 668).

2. No error warranting the grant of a new trial appears in the excerpts from the charge of the court complained of in grounds 2, 3, 4, and 5 of the amendment to the motion for a new trial; and there is no merit in grounds 6 and 7.

3. In the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error the general grounds of the motion for a new trial are expressly abandoned.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sheppard v. State
113 S.E. 54 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Hudson v. State
107 S.E. 94 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
Perdue & Pace v. Hurst
100 S.E. 647 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 S.E. 934, 22 Ga. App. 253, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morrow-v-state-gactapp-1918.