Morrow v. Commissioner

9 B.T.A. 448, 1927 BTA LEXIS 2584
United States Board of Tax Appeals·Decided December 1, 1927·No. Docket Nos. 10488, 13011.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION.

Love:

By section 216 (c) of the Revenue Acts of 1921 and 1924, it is provided that in computing the normal tax a single person shall be allowed a personal exemption of $1,000 and the head of a family shall be allowed an exemption of $2,500, except that the Revenue Act. of 1921 restricts this exemption to $2,000 where the net income is in excess of $5,000.

The petitioner takes the position that during the years 1923 and 1924 he was the head of a family and is entitled to the exemption of [450] $2,000 and $2,500 for the respective years. The respondent contends that the petitioner is entitled only to the exemption of $1,000 provided in the case of a single person.

We have heretofore had occasion to pass upon the question involved in this proceeding in Hannah D. Stratton, 5 B. T. A. 1025.

In view of the Board’s reasoning in the above-quoted proceedings, we are of the opinion that the petitioner herein was not the head of a family within the meaning of the Revenue Acts of 1921 and 1924.

Judgment will be entered for the respondent.

Considered by Trussell, Smith, and LittletoN.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morrow v. Commissioner, 9 B.T.A. 448, 1927 BTA LEXIS 2584 (bta 1927).

9 B.T.A. 448 (Morrow v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hirsch v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
124 F.2d 24 (Ninth Circuit, 1941)
Morrow v. Commissioner
9 B.T.A. 448 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1927)