Morrow v. Commissioner

9 B.T.A. 448, 1927 BTA LEXIS 2584
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedDecember 1, 1927
DocketDocket Nos. 10488, 13011.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 9 B.T.A. 448 (Morrow v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morrow v. Commissioner, 9 B.T.A. 448, 1927 BTA LEXIS 2584 (bta 1927).

Opinion

OPINION.

Love:

By section 216 (c) of the Revenue Acts of 1921 and 1924, it is provided that in computing the normal tax a single person shall be allowed a personal exemption of $1,000 and the head of a family shall be allowed an exemption of $2,500, except that the Revenue Act. of 1921 restricts this exemption to $2,000 where the net income is in excess of $5,000.

The petitioner takes the position that during the years 1923 and 1924 he was the head of a family and is entitled to the exemption of [450]*450$2,000 and $2,500 for the respective years. The respondent contends that the petitioner is entitled only to the exemption of $1,000 provided in the case of a single person.

We have heretofore had occasion to pass upon the question involved in this proceeding in Hannah D. Stratton, 5 B. T. A. 1025.

In view of the Board’s reasoning in the above-quoted proceedings, we are of the opinion that the petitioner herein was not the head of a family within the meaning of the Revenue Acts of 1921 and 1924.

Judgment will be entered for the respondent.

Considered by Trussell, Smith, and LittletoN.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hirsch v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
124 F.2d 24 (Ninth Circuit, 1941)
Morrow v. Commissioner
9 B.T.A. 448 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 B.T.A. 448, 1927 BTA LEXIS 2584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morrow-v-commissioner-bta-1927.