Morrison v. State
185 So. 2d 193, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5243
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 19, 1966·No. No. 65-920·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Appellant was tried and convicted of breaking and entering a store building with intent to commit grand larceny. Subsequently, he filed a motion for relief pursuant to Rule No. I, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix. The sole allegation of this motion was that he was inadequately represented by the Public Defender who refused to file a motion for new trial and an appeal.
Inasmuch as the record conclusively refutes the allegation, the trial judge correctly denied the motion without a hearing thereon.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Morrison v. State, 185 So. 2d 193, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5243 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).
185 So. 2d 193 (Morrison v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Baker v. State
191 So. 2d 284 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)