Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Morrison v. State

Morrison v. State

185 So. 2d 193, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5243
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 19, 1966
DocketNo. 65-920
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 185 So. 2d 193 (Morrison v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morrison v. State, 185 So. 2d 193, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5243 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was tried and convicted of breaking and entering a store building with intent to commit grand larceny. Subsequently, he filed a motion for relief pursuant to Rule No. I, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix. The sole allegation of this motion was that he was inadequately represented by the Public Defender who refused to file a motion for new trial and an appeal.

Inasmuch as the record conclusively refutes the allegation, the trial judge correctly denied the motion without a hearing thereon.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baker v. State
191 So. 2d 284 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
185 So. 2d 193, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morrison-v-state-fladistctapp-1966.