Morris Weisfeld, D/B/A M & W Fruit Company v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company

Fifth Circuit

Morris Weisfeld, D/B/A M & W Fruit Company v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company

354 F.2d 241

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 5, 1966

Docket22278_1

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 354 F.2d 241 (Morris Weisfeld, D/B/A M & W Fruit Company v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morris Weisfeld, D/B/A M & W Fruit Company v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, 354 F.2d 241 (5th Cir. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The district court’s opinion sets forth the facts from which the controversy presented by this appeal have arisen. Weisfeld v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, 236 F.Supp. 496. In its opinion, the district court expresses its view of the controlling principle of law. We are in agreement with the result reached by the district court and its judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The district court’s opinion sets forth the facts from which the controversy presented by this appeal have arisen. Weisfeld v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, 236 F.Supp. 496. In its opinion, the district court expresses its view of the controlling principle of law. We are in agreement with the result reached by the district court and its judgment is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

354 F.2d 241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-weisfeld-dba-m-w-fruit-company-v-st-paul-fire-and-marine-ca5-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack