Morris v. State
940 So. 2d 1172, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 15494, 2006 WL 2684834
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Morris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 12765 →
Opinion
Freddie L. Morris appeals the summary dismissal of his motion for postconviction DNA testing filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853. We affirm the postconviction court’s dismissal of the motion because it is facially insufficient. Our affirmance is without prejudice to any right Morris might have to file a timely facially sufficient rule 3.853 motion. See Harvey v. State, 925 So.2d 1111 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Scarborough v. State, 906 So.2d 379 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Morris v. State, 940 So. 2d 1172, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 15494, 2006 WL 2684834 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
940 So. 2d 1172 (Morris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Harvey v. State
925 So. 2d 1111 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Scarborough v. State
906 So. 2d 379 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)