Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Morris v. State

Morris v. State

940 So. 2d 1172, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 15494, 2006 WL 2684834
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 20, 2006
DocketNo. 2D06-1909
StatusPublished

This text of 940 So. 2d 1172 (Morris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morris v. State, 940 So. 2d 1172, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 15494, 2006 WL 2684834 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

VILLANTI, Judge.

Freddie L. Morris appeals the summary dismissal of his motion for postconviction DNA testing filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853. We affirm the postconviction court’s dismissal of the motion because it is facially insufficient. Our affirmance is without prejudice to any right Morris might have to file a timely facially sufficient rule 3.853 motion. See Harvey v. State, 925 So.2d 1111 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Scarborough v. State, 906 So.2d 379 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).

Affirmed.

STRINGER and LaROSE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harvey v. State
925 So. 2d 1111 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Scarborough v. State
906 So. 2d 379 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
940 So. 2d 1172, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 15494, 2006 WL 2684834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.