Morris v. State
683 So. 2d 207, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12474, 1996 WL 682224
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Morris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 658 So. 2d 155 →
Opinion
Based upon our review of the record, we cannot conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to permit appellant’s self-representation at trial after a Faretta1 hearing. Hardy v. State, 655 So.2d 1245, 1247 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (citing Kearse v. State, 605 So.2d 534, 537 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), rev. denied, 613 So.2d 5 (Fla.1993)), rev. denied, 667 So.2d 774 (Fla.1996).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Morris v. State, 683 So. 2d 207, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12474, 1996 WL 682224 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
683 So. 2d 207 (Morris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Faretta v. California
422 U.S. 806 (Supreme Court, 1975)
Hardy v. State
655 So. 2d 1245 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Kearse v. State
605 So. 2d 534 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)