Morris v. State
This text of 630 So. 2d 232 (Morris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Marvin MORRIS, a/k/a Sylvester Anderson, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
*233 Marvin Morris, a/k/a Sylvester Anderson, in pro. per.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and GODERICH, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Since the appellant's unauthorized successive motion for rehearing, filed after his first motion for rehearing was denied, did not suspend the rendition time for review of the order denying his motion for 3.850 relief, see Shelby Mut. Ins. Co. v. Pearson, 236 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1970), the present appeal, filed several months after the denial of the "first" motion for rehearing, is dismissed as untimely filed. See Dominguez v. Barakat, 609 So.2d 664 (Fla.3d DCA 1992).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
630 So. 2d 232, 1994 WL 26838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.