Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Morris v. State

Morris v. State

524 So. 2d 494, 1988 WL 40954
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 5, 1988·No. 87-1034·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

524 So.2d 494 (1988)

Christopher Ray MORRIS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-1034.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

May 5, 1988.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Barbara L. Condon, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard B. Martell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Christopher Ray Morris, challenges the imposition of $225 in costs pursuant to sections 27.3455(1), 960.20 and 943.25, Florida Statutes (1985).

Pursuant to the recent Florida Supreme Court cases of Harriel v. State, 520 So.2d 271 (Fla. 1988), and Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla. 1988), we quash the imposition of costs below and remand for assessment of costs after notice and hearing in accordance with Harriel and Mays.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SHARP, C.J., and DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morris v. State, 524 So. 2d 494, 1988 WL 40954 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

524 So. 2d 494 (Morris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Santana v. State
564 So. 2d 245 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Clark v. State
560 So. 2d 264 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Scott v. State
543 So. 2d 1325 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Millsap v. State
542 So. 2d 465 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
White v. State
539 So. 2d 1190 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Murphy v. State
539 So. 2d 22 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Morgan v. State
527 So. 2d 968 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)