Morris v. State
356 So. 2d 44, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15099
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Morris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 18775 →
Opinion
Appellant’s sole assignment of error is that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a new trial. However, he has failed to provide this court with a transcript of the hearing on that motion. Consequently, since we must presume that a trial court’s order is correct unless the record otherwise demonstrates, we affirm appellant’s conviction. Abascal v. State, 345 So.2d 397 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Savage v. State, 156 So.2d 566 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Morris v. State, 356 So. 2d 44, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15099 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).
356 So. 2d 44 (Morris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Savage v. State
156 So. 2d 566 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
Abascal v. State
345 So. 2d 397 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)