Morris v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Morris v. State

356 So. 2d 44, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15099

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 8, 1978

DocketNo. 76-1454

StatusPublished

This text of 356 So. 2d 44 (Morris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morris v. State, 356 So. 2d 44, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15099 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

RYDER, Judge.

Appellant’s sole assignment of error is that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a new trial. However, he has failed to provide this court with a transcript of the hearing on that motion. Consequently, since we must presume that a trial court’s order is correct unless the record otherwise demonstrates, we affirm appellant’s conviction. Abascal v. State, 345 So.2d 397 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Savage v. State, 156 So.2d 566 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963).

BOARDMAN, C. J., and DANAHY, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RYDER, Judge.

Appellant’s sole assignment of error is that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a new trial. However, he has failed to provide this court with a transcript of the hearing on that motion. Consequently, since we must presume that a trial court’s order is correct unless the record otherwise demonstrates, we affirm appellant’s conviction. Abascal v. State, 345 So.2d 397 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Savage v. State, 156 So.2d 566 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963).

BOARDMAN, C. J., and DANAHY, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

356 So. 2d 44, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15099, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-state-fladistctapp-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack