Morris v. North Carolina Court of Appeals

103 F. App'x 765
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 4, 2004
Docket04-1783
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 103 F. App'x 765 (Morris v. North Carolina Court of Appeals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morris v. North Carolina Court of Appeals, 103 F. App'x 765 (4th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

John Lee Morris, Sr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Morris v. North Carolina Ct. of Appeals, No. CA-04-213-1 (M.D.N.C. May 28, 2004). We further deny Morris’ mo *766 tion for preparation of a transcript at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morris v. Court of Appeals of North Carolina
544 U.S. 1002 (Supreme Court, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 F. App'x 765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-north-carolina-court-of-appeals-ca4-2004.