Morris v. North Carolina Court of Appeals

42 F. App'x 652
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 19, 2002
DocketNo. 02-1620
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 42 F. App'x 652 (Morris v. North Carolina Court of Appeals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morris v. North Carolina Court of Appeals, 42 F. App'x 652 (4th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

John Lee Morris, Sr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Morris v. N.C. Court of Appeals, No. CA-02-327 (M.D.N.C. May 22, 2002). We further deny Morris’ motions for payment of $35,000 from the North Carolina Supreme Court for falsification of the record; for payment of $35,000 from the North Carolina Court of Appeals for falsification of the record; for replacement of Bibles in every courthouse with dictionaries and the return of the Bibles to the schools; to amend his actions upon Jan Taylor & Ei-sai, Inc., and Mike Jones & the Budd Group; and for suspension of rules pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 2. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morris v. Court of Appeals of North Carolina
538 U.S. 1044 (Supreme Court, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 F. App'x 652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-north-carolina-court-of-appeals-ca4-2002.