Morris v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FILED

)AN 1a 2011 WAYNE NEVILLE MORR‘S» c‘i‘.;°§“§l’a?a.“l%‘{§i.§ii?,?%‘§,'.‘£.‘&‘.?.la Plaintiff,

v. Civil Action No. 09-2034 (RJL) FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al.,

Defendants.

;\J\J\/\.J\}§L/\/§/\é\,/

MEMoRANi)UM oPiNioN January 2011

Defendants filed a motion to dismiss on August 17, 20lO. In its August 23, 2010 Order, the Court advised plaintiff, among other things, of his obligation to file an opposition or other response to the inotion. Fui'ther, that Order expressly warned plaintiff that, if he failed to file his opposition by Septeinber 24, 2010, the Court would treat the motion as conceded. On plaintiffs motions, the Court twice has extended the deadline for his opposition, most recently to Deceinber 23, ZOlO. To date, plaintiff neither has filed his opposition nor has requested more time to do so. Accordingly, the defendants’ motion will be treated as conceded and this action will be dismissed.

An Order is issued separately.

@a..a@w

RICHARD J.\I>EY®N United States District Judge