Morris v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided June 28, 2011·No. Civil Action No. 2009-2034·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

WAYNE NEVILLE MORRIS,

Plaintiff,

v. Civil Action No. 09-2034 (RJL)

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et at.,

Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff is a federal prisoner who has filed this action to challenge the Federal Bureau of

Prisons' policies regarding religious diets. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss [Dkt. #21] on

August 17, 20lO, and pursuant to the Court's August 23,2010 Order, plaintiffs opposition was

due not later than September 24, 2010. The Court twice extended the opposition deadline at

plaintiffs request. On January 18,2011, the Court granted defendants' motion as conceded

because plaintiff had not filed an opposition timely. On plaintiffs motion, the Court vacated the

dismissal order and extended the opposition deadline most recently to June 15, 2011. To date,

plaintiff neither has filed his opposition or requested more time to do so. Accordingly,

defendants' motion will be granted as conceded.

An Order accompanies this Memorandum ~

RICHARD J. LEON United States District Judge DATE:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morris v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, (D.D.C. 2011).

Morris v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (Morris v. Federal Bureau of Prisons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.