Morris v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
This text of Morris v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (Morris v. Federal Bureau of Prisons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
FILED
)AN 1a 2011 WAYNE NEVILLE MORR‘S» c‘i‘.;°§“§l’a?a.“l%‘{§i.§ii?,?%‘§,'.‘£.‘&‘.?.la Plaintiff,
v. Civil Action No. 09-2034 (RJL) FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al.,
Defendants.
;\J\J\/\.J\}§L/\/§/\é\,/
MEMoRANi)UM oPiNioN January 2011
Defendants filed a motion to dismiss on August 17, 20lO. In its August 23, 2010 Order, the Court advised plaintiff, among other things, of his obligation to file an opposition or other response to the inotion. Fui'ther, that Order expressly warned plaintiff that, if he failed to file his opposition by Septeinber 24, 2010, the Court would treat the motion as conceded. On plaintiffs motions, the Court twice has extended the deadline for his opposition, most recently to Deceinber 23, ZOlO. To date, plaintiff neither has filed his opposition nor has requested more time to do so. Accordingly, the defendants’ motion will be treated as conceded and this action will be dismissed.
An Order is issued separately.
@a..a@w
RICHARD J.\I>EY®N United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Morris v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-federal-bureau-of-prisons-dcd-2011.