Morris v. County of Suffolk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Morris v. County of Suffolk

106 A.D.2d 446, 482 N.Y.S.2d 539, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21484

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 10, 1984

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 106 A.D.2d 446 (Morris v. County of Suffolk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morris v. County of Suffolk, 106 A.D.2d 446, 482 N.Y.S.2d 539, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21484 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

—In consolidated proceedings pursuant to CPLR article 75 in which, inter [447]*447alia, the appellant County of Suffolk sought to vacate an arbitrator’s award and Edward Morris applied on his own behalf and on behalf of all deputy sheriffs employed by the county to confirm said award, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.), entered February 8, 1984, which confirmed the award.

Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The arbitrator’s award cannot fairly be said to have been totally irrational. Rather the arbitrator interpreted the disputed term of the contract in light of what he found to be the intent of the parties (Matter of Local Div. 1179 [Green Bus Lines], 50 NY2d 1007). The award also is not violative of public policy (see Matter of Sprinzen [Nomberg], 46 NY2d 623). Thompson, J. P., O’Connor, Niehoff and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In consolidated proceedings pursuant to CPLR article 75 in which, inter [447]*447alia, the appellant County of Suffolk sought to vacate an arbitrator’s award and Edward Morris applied on his own behalf and on behalf of all deputy sheriffs employed by the county to confirm said award, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.), entered February 8, 1984, which confirmed the award.

Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The arbitrator’s award cannot fairly be said to have been totally irrational. Rather the arbitrator interpreted the disputed term of the contract in light of what he found to be the intent of the parties (Matter of Local Div. 1179 [Green Bus Lines], 50 NY2d 1007). The award also is not violative of public policy (see Matter of Sprinzen [Nomberg], 46 NY2d 623). Thompson, J. P., O’Connor, Niehoff and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 A.D.2d 446, 482 N.Y.S.2d 539, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-county-of-suffolk-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack