In re the Arbitration between Local Division 1179, Amalgamated Transit Union & Green Bus Lines, Inc.

409 N.E.2d 1354, 50 N.Y.2d 1007, 431 N.Y.S.2d 680, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2535
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 1, 1980
StatusPublished
Cited by40 cases

This text of 409 N.E.2d 1354 (In re the Arbitration between Local Division 1179, Amalgamated Transit Union & Green Bus Lines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Arbitration between Local Division 1179, Amalgamated Transit Union & Green Bus Lines, Inc., 409 N.E.2d 1354, 50 N.Y.2d 1007, 431 N.Y.S.2d 680, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2535 (N.Y. 1980).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, the motion to vacate the arbitration award denied, and the cross motion to confirm the award granted. The certified question is not answered as unnecessary.

It was error for the Appellate Division to have vacated the award merely because it disagreed with the arbitrator’s interpretation of the parties’ agreement. When an arbitrator has been empowered to interpret a contract, the resulting award [1009]*1009is not subject to vacatur unless it is totally irrational (e.g., Rochester City School Dist. v Rochester Teachers Assn., 41 NY2d 578, 582; Matter of National Cash Register Co. [Wilson], 8 NY2d 377, 383). Parties who agree to refer contract disputes to arbitration must recognize that " '[arbitrators may do justice’ and the award may well reflect the spirit rather than the letter of the agreement” (Rochester City School Dist. v Rochester Teachers Assn., supra, at p 582). Courts may not overturn an award because they believe the arbitrator has misconstrued the apparent, or even the obvious, meaning of the contract (id.). Here, the arbitrator, resolving the very dispute submitted to him, interpreted the agreement in light of what he found to be the intent of the parties. In doing so, we cannot conclude that he reached a completely irrational result.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg concur in memorandum; Judge Meyer taking no part.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kanner v. Westchester Med. Group, P.L.L.C.
New York Supreme Court, 2023
Matter of T & C Home Design, LLC v. Stylecraft Corp.
140 A.D.3d 777 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Bridge & Tunnel Offices Benevolent Ass'n v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority
57 A.D.3d 398 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Larsen & Toubro Ltd. v. Millenium Management, Inc.
37 A.D.3d 213 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
In re the Arbitration between Civil Service Employees Ass'n & Niagara Falls Bridge Commission
32 A.D.3d 1186 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Chesley
7 A.D.3d 368 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
City of Newburgh v. Police Benevolent Ass'n of Newburgh, New York, Inc.
272 A.D.2d 326 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Board of Education v. Hempstead Classroom Teachers Ass'n
251 A.D.2d 502 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Sampson v. Board of Education
191 A.D.2d 283 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Twiss Associates, Inc. v. Imptex International Corp.
189 A.D.2d 672 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Altamore v. Newsday, Inc.
175 A.D.2d 684 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
New York City Transit Authority v. Subway-Surface Supervisors Ass'n
173 A.D.2d 707 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Correction Officers Benevolent Ass'n v. City of New York
160 A.D.2d 548 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Meehan v. Nassau Community College
152 A.D.2d 313 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
New York City Transit Police Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n v. New York City Transit Authority
150 A.D.2d 452 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Dicker v. Jodi-Lynn Washomatic, Inc.
149 A.D.2d 649 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Board of Education of the Mt. Sinai Union Free School District v. Mt. Sinai Teachers' Ass'n
139 A.D.2d 733 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
In re the Arbitration between Schenectady Police Benevolent Ass'n & City of Schenectady
129 A.D.2d 937 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
In re the Arbitration between Town of Callicoon & Civil Service Employees Ass'n
126 A.D.2d 45 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
409 N.E.2d 1354, 50 N.Y.2d 1007, 431 N.Y.S.2d 680, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-local-division-1179-amalgamated-transit-ny-1980.