In re the Arbitration between Town of Callicoon & Civil Service Employees Ass'n

519 N.E.2d 300, 70 N.Y.2d 907, 524 N.Y.S.2d 389, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 19947
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 21, 1987
StatusPublished
Cited by113 cases

This text of 519 N.E.2d 300 (In re the Arbitration between Town of Callicoon & Civil Service Employees Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Arbitration between Town of Callicoon & Civil Service Employees Ass'n, 519 N.E.2d 300, 70 N.Y.2d 907, 524 N.Y.S.2d 389, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 19947 (N.Y. 1987).

Opinion

[909]*909OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the judgment of Supreme Court reinstated.

Where a dispute has been arbitrated pursuant to a broad arbitration agreement between the parties, the resulting award may not be vacated unless it is violative of a strong public policy, is totally irrational or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator’s power (Matter of Silverman [Benmor Coats], 61 NY2d 299, 308; Matter of Board of Educ. v Dover-Wingdale Teachers’ Assn., 61 NY2d 913; Matter of Local Div. 1179 [Green Bus Lines], 50 NY2d 1007; Rochester City School Dist. v Rochester Teachers Assn., 41 NY2d 578).

Here, the arbitration was conducted pursuant to a broad arbitration clause in the parties’ collective bargaining agreement, which empowered the arbitrator to resolve disputes concerning the interpretation and application of the agreement, subject only to the limitation that the arbitrator could not add to or subtract from the agreement (see, Matter of Town of Haverstraw [Rockland County Patrolmen’s Benevolent Assn.] 65 NY2d 677; Matter of Local Div. 1179 [Green Bus Lines], supra; Matter of Sprinzen [Nomberg], 46 NY2d 623).

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur in memorandum.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Klein v. Pereira
140 A.D.3d 958 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
County of Putnam v. Putnam County Sheriff's Employees Ass'n
90 A.D.3d 922 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Seneca Insurance v. Ruday Realty Corp.
87 A.D.3d 579 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Romaine v. New York City Transit Authority
82 A.D.3d 986 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Local 456, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. City of Yonkers
75 A.D.3d 555 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
In re the Arbitration between Kowaleski & New York State Department of Correctional Services
61 A.D.3d 1081 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Town of Wallkill v. Town of Wallkill Police Benevolent Ass'n
56 A.D.2d 482 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Deragon v. Burkart
55 A.D.3d 1309 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
In re the Arbitration between Local 2841 of New York State Law Enforcement Officers Union & City of Albany
53 A.D.3d 974 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
In re Arbitration between American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance & Utica First Insurance
37 A.D.3d 1093 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
In re the Arbitration between Rochester City School District & Rochester Ass'n of Paraprofessionals
34 A.D.3d 1351 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
In re the Arbitration between Albany County Sheriffs Local 775 & County of Albany
27 A.D.3d 979 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Hausknecht v. Comprehensive Medical Care of New York, P.C.
24 A.D.3d 778 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
New York City Transit Authority v. Transport Workers' Union of America
845 N.E.2d 1243 (New York Court of Appeals, 2005)
In re the Arbitration between Civil Service Employees Ass'n & State
15 A.D.3d 748 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
New York City Transit Authority v. Transport Workers' Union of America, Local 100
13 A.D.3d 542 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
In re the Arbitration between Buffalo Professional Firefighters Ass'n, Local 282 & City of Buffalo
12 A.D.3d 1087 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
519 N.E.2d 300, 70 N.Y.2d 907, 524 N.Y.S.2d 389, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 19947, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-town-of-callicoon-civil-service-employees-ny-1987.