Morris v. Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Morris v. Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co.

95 S.E. 748, 22 Ga. App. 186, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 228

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 10, 1918

Docket9360

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 95 S.E. 748 (Morris v. Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morris v. Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co., 95 S.E. 748, 22 Ga. App. 186, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 228 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The court did not err in sustaining the demurrer to the petition.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.

The demurrer was on the grounds that no cause of action was set out, and that it was apparent that the plaintiff was injured “as the result of his own action.” ■

T. F. Harrison, T. 8. Peebles Jr., for plaintiff, cited:

Lawrenceville Oil Mill v. Walton, 143 Ga. 259 (1); Williams v. Garbult Lumber Co., 132 Ga. 227.

W. K. Miller, for defendant, cited:

Bolden v. Central Ry. Co., 130 Ga. 456-7; Lee v. A. C. L. R. Co., 125 Ga. 655; Banks v. Schofield’s Sons Co., 126 Ga. 667; Southern Ry. Co. v. Hightower, 146 Ga. 279; W. & A. R. Co. v. Bradford, 113 Ga. 276; A. & C. Air-Line Ry. v. Ray, 70 Ga. 674 (3); Ga. R. Co. v. Nelms, 83 Ga. 70; R. & D. R. Co. v. Dickey, 90 Ga. 491 (2); Stewart v. S. A. L. Ry., 115 Ga. 624, 628; Southern Ry. Co. v. Taylor, 137 Ga. 704; Up-church v. Culpepper, 17 Ga. App. 577; Belk v. Lee Roy Myers Co., 17 Ga. App. 684; Williams v. A. C. L. R. Co., 18 Ga. App. 120.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworth, J.

The court did not err in sustaining the demurrer to the petition.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.

The demurrer was on the grounds that no cause of action was set out, and that it was apparent that the plaintiff was injured “as the result of his own action.” ■

T. F. Harrison, T. 8. Peebles Jr., for plaintiff, cited:

Lawrenceville Oil Mill v. Walton, 143 Ga. 259 (1); Williams v. Garbult Lumber Co., 132 Ga. 227.

W. K. Miller, for defendant, cited:

Bolden v. Central Ry. Co., 130 Ga. 456-7; Lee v. A. C. L. R. Co., 125 Ga. 655; Banks v. Schofield’s Sons Co., 126 Ga. 667; Southern Ry. Co. v. Hightower, 146 Ga. 279; W. & A. R. Co. v. Bradford, 113 Ga. 276; A. & C. Air-Line Ry. v. Ray, 70 Ga. 674 (3); Ga. R. Co. v. Nelms, 83 Ga. 70; R. & D. R. Co. v. Dickey, 90 Ga. 491 (2); Stewart v. S. A. L. Ry., 115 Ga. 624, 628; Southern Ry. Co. v. Taylor, 137 Ga. 704; Up-church v. Culpepper, 17 Ga. App. 577; Belk v. Lee Roy Myers Co., 17 Ga. App. 684; Williams v. A. C. L. R. Co., 18 Ga. App. 120.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 S.E. 748, 22 Ga. App. 186, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-charleston-western-carolina-railway-co-gactapp-1918.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack