Morris v. Alabama
This text of 302 U.S. 642 (Morris v. Alabama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Alabama.
The appeal herein is dismissed (1) for the want of a substantial federal question, Missouri v. Lewis, 101 U. S. 22, 30, 31; Gardner v. Michigan, 199 U. S. 325, 333, 334; Fort Smith Light Co. v. Paving District, 274 U. S. 387, 391; Ohio v. Akron Park District, 281 U. S. 74, 81; (2) for the want of a properly presented federal question, Citizens’ Savings Bank v. Owensboro, 173 U. S. 636, 643; New York v. Kleinert, 268 U. S. 646, 650; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700. The motion for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
302 U.S. 642, 58 S. Ct. 58, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-alabama-scotus-1937.