Morris v. Alabama

302 U.S. 642, 58 S. Ct. 58
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 18, 1937·No. No. 440·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Appeal from the Supreme Court of Alabama.

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed (1) for the want of a substantial federal question, Missouri v. Lewis, 101 U. S. 22, 30, 31; Gardner v. Michigan, 199 U. S. 325, 333, 334; Fort Smith Light Co. v. Paving District, 274 U. S. 387, 391; Ohio v. Akron Park District, 281 U. S. 74, 81; (2) for the want of a properly presented federal question, Citizens’ Savings Bank v. Owensboro, 173 U. S. 636, 643; New York v. Kleinert, 268 U. S. 646, 650; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700. The motion for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morris v. Alabama, 302 U.S. 642, 58 S. Ct. 58 (1937).

302 U.S. 642 (Morris v. Alabama) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burns v. State
19 So. 2d 450 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1944)
Vernon v. State
18 So. 2d 388 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1944)
Hughes v. Wisconsin Tax Commission Et Al.
304 U.S. 548 (Supreme Court, 1938)