Dromey, Administrator v. Wisconsin Tax Commission Et Al.

304 U.S. 548
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 25, 1938
Docket997
StatusPublished

This text of 304 U.S. 548 (Dromey, Administrator v. Wisconsin Tax Commission Et Al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dromey, Administrator v. Wisconsin Tax Commission Et Al., 304 U.S. 548 (1938).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Hiawassee Power Co. v. Carolina-Tenn. Co., 252 U. S. 341, 344; Whitney v. California, 274 U. S. 357, 360; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700; Morris v. Alabama, 302 U. S. 642; (2) Lawrence v. State Tax Commission, 286 U. S. 276, 279-281; New York ex rel. Cohn v. Graves, 300 *549 U. S. 308, 313; Mitchell v. United States, 21 Wall. 350, 353.

Mr. S. W. Jensch for appellant. Mr. Joseph E. Messerschmidt for respondents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mitchell v. United States
88 U.S. 350 (Supreme Court, 1875)
Whitney v. California
274 U.S. 357 (Supreme Court, 1927)
Lawrence v. State Tax Comm'n of Miss.
286 U.S. 276 (Supreme Court, 1932)
Cunningham v. California
549 U.S. 270 (Supreme Court, 2007)
Morris v. Alabama
302 U.S. 642 (Supreme Court, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
304 U.S. 548, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dromey-administrator-v-wisconsin-tax-commission-et-al-scotus-1938.