Dromey, Administrator v. Wisconsin Tax Commission Et Al.

Supreme Court

Dromey, Administrator v. Wisconsin Tax Commission Et Al.

304 U.S. 548

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 25, 1938·No. 997·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Hiawassee Power Co. v. Carolina-Tenn. Co., 252 U. S. 341, 344; Whitney v. California, 274 U. S. 357, 360; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700; Morris v. Alabama, 302 U. S. 642; (2) Lawrence v. State Tax Commission, 286 U. S. 276, 279-281; New York ex rel. Cohn v. Graves, 300 *549 U. S. 308, 313; Mitchell v. United States, 21 Wall. 350, 353.

Mr. S. W. Jensch for appellant. Mr. Joseph E. Messerschmidt for respondents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Hiawassee Power Co. v. Carolina-Tenn. Co., 252 U. S. 341, 344; Whitney v. California, 274 U. S. 357, 360; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700; Morris v. Alabama, 302 U. S. 642; (2) Lawrence v. State Tax Commission, 286 U. S. 276, 279-281; New York ex rel. Cohn v. Graves, 300 *549 U. S. 308, 313; Mitchell v. United States, 21 Wall. 350, 353.

Mr. S. W. Jensch for appellant. Mr. Joseph E. Messerschmidt for respondents.

Dromey, Administrator v. Wisconsin Tax Commission Et Al., 304 U.S. 548 (1938).

Pincite

304 U.S. 548 (Dromey, Administrator v. Wisconsin Tax Commission Et Al.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related