Morris Maxwell v. Moab Investment Group, LLC

632 F. App'x 424
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 28, 2016
Docket14-17334
StatusUnpublished

This text of 632 F. App'x 424 (Morris Maxwell v. Moab Investment Group, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morris Maxwell v. Moab Investment Group, LLC, 632 F. App'x 424 (9th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Morris S. and Shawn R. Maxwell appeal pro se from the district court’s order declaring them vexatious litigants and imposing pre-filing restrictions. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. Molski v. Evergreen Dynasty Corp., 500 F.3d 1047, 1056-57 (9th Cir.2007) (per curiam). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by declaring the Maxwells vexatious litigants and entering a pre-filing order against them after providing them with notice and an opportunity to' be heard, developing an adequate record for review, making substantive findings regarding their frivolous litigation history, and tailoring the restriction narrowly. See id. at 1057, 1058-61 (discussing factors to consider before imposing pre-filing restrictions).

We reject as meritless the Maxwells’ contentions that they were denied due pro *425 cess and equal protection due to a lack of a full and fair hearing on their claims.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
632 F. App'x 424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-maxwell-v-moab-investment-group-llc-ca9-2016.