Morrin v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Morrin v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

904 N.E.2d 536, 121 Ohio St. 3d 359

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 7, 2009·No. No. 2008-0277·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Thorton v. Montville Plastics & Rubber, Inc., 121 Ohio St.3d 124, 2009-Ohio-360, 902 N.E.2d 482.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Connor, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in Thorton v. Montville Plastics & Rubber, Inc., 121 Ohio St.3d 124, 2009-Ohio-360, 902 N.E.2d 482.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Thorton v. Montville Plastics & Rubber, Inc., 121 Ohio St.3d 124, 2009-Ohio-360, 902 N.E.2d 482.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Connor, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in Thorton v. Montville Plastics & Rubber, Inc., 121 Ohio St.3d 124, 2009-Ohio-360, 902 N.E.2d 482.

Morrin v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 904 N.E.2d 536, 121 Ohio St. 3d 359 (Ohio 2009).

Pincite

904 N.E.2d 536 (Morrin v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related