Morrill v. Hurley

120 Mass. 99, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 122
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 22, 1876·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

By ttte Court.

The facts agreed show merely that the defendant did not prevent surface water from accumulating upon his own land and thence flowing upon the land of the plaintiff. This gave the plaintiff no cause of action. Gannon v. Hargadon, 10 Allen, 106. Bates v. Smith, 100 Mass. 181.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morrill v. Hurley, 120 Mass. 99, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 122 (Mass. 1876).

120 Mass. 99 (Morrill v. Hurley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maddock v. City of Springfield
183 N.E. 148 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1932)
Bates v. Inhabitants of Westborough
7 L.R.A. 156 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1890)
Collins v. City of Waltham
24 N.E. 327 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1890)