Bates v. Smith

100 Mass. 181
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1868
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 100 Mass. 181 (Bates v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bates v. Smith, 100 Mass. 181 (Mass. 1868).

Opinion

Chapman, C. J.

A proprietor of land may erect structures upon it as solid and as high as he pleases, without regard to their effect upon surface water which would otherwise come from the adjoining lands upon his soil. Gannon v. Hargadon, 10 Allen, 107. Franklin v. Fisk, 13 Allen, 211. The fact that the adjoining land is occupied for a burial ground does not abridge his rights in this respect. The erection of a structure which prevents the surface water that gathers upon the burial ground from flowing off over his land is not a violation of Gen. Sts. c. 28, § 12, or c. 165, § 39; for the proprietors of the ground have no easement which he violates or obstructs. If the water constitutes a nuisance, he did not create the nuisance, The motive which influences a man to exercise his right is no material in such a case as this. Judgment for the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Deyo v. Athol Housing Authority
140 N.E.2d 393 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1957)
Maddock v. City of Springfield
183 N.E. 148 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1932)
McMahon v. City of Holyoke
115 N.E. 920 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1917)
Franklin v. Durgee
58 L.R.A. 112 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1901)
Cass v. Dicks
44 P. 113 (Washington Supreme Court, 1896)
Morrissey v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
56 N.W. 946 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1893)
Bates v. Inhabitants of Westborough
7 L.R.A. 156 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1890)
Chicago & Alton Railroad v. Connors
25 Ill. App. 561 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1887)
Cassidy v. Old Colony Railroad
5 N.E. 142 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1886)
Rathke v. Gardner
134 Mass. 14 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1883)
Murphy v. Kelley
68 Me. 521 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1878)
Taylor v. Fickas
64 Ind. 167 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1878)
Morrison v. Bucksport & Bangor Railroad
67 Me. 353 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1877)
Morrill v. Hurley
120 Mass. 99 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1876)
Eaton v. B. C. & M. R. R.
51 N.H. 504 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1872)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 Mass. 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bates-v-smith-mass-1868.