Mori v. Industrial Leasing Corp.

468 So. 2d 1066, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1205
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 14, 1985
Docket83-1342
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 468 So. 2d 1066 (Mori v. Industrial Leasing Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mori v. Industrial Leasing Corp., 468 So. 2d 1066, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1205 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

468 So.2d 1066 (1985)

Juan MORI and Jean Mori As Personal Representatives of the Estate of Cindy Mori, a Deceased Minor, Appellants,
v.
INDUSTRIAL LEASING CORPORATION, a Foreign Corporation, Appellee.

No. 83-1342.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 14, 1985.

Horton, Perse & Ginsberg and Edward Perse, Herbert W. Virgin III, Miami, for appellants.

Peters, Pickle, Flynn & Niemoeller and Donna S. Catoe, Miami, for appellee.

Before NESBITT, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The Moris appeal an order dismissing their complaint with prejudice. We affirm.

The Moris' minor daughter was killed when struck by a car in the Card Sound Bridge area in 1980. A wrongful death action was filed against Capeletti Brothers, Inc., the construction contractors. The complaint alleged that the contractors were negligent in failing to construct a parking *1067 area and a barricade to separate vehicular traffic from pedestrians. The trial judge granted Capeletti Brothers' motion to dismiss, basing his decision, in part, on the holding in Slavin v. Kay, 108 So.2d 462 (Fla. 1959) (on rehearing).

In Slavin, the Florida supreme court clearly adopted the rule that a contractor is not liable for injuries to third parties caused by obvious defects or dangerous conditions which occur after the contractor has completed the work and it has been accepted by the owner. Since the defects alleged in the complaint, a lack of parking and barricades, were obvious, see Payne v. Broward County, 461 So.2d 63 (Fla. 1984), the contractor is relieved of liability under Slavin. Accordingly, we affirm the dismissal of the complaint with prejudice.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Plaza v. Fisher Development, Inc.
971 So. 2d 918 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Lynch v. Norton Construction, Inc.
861 P.2d 1095 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1993)
Kala Investments, Inc. v. Sklar
538 So. 2d 909 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Easterday v. Masiello
518 So. 2d 260 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Birch v. Capeletti Brothers, Inc.
478 So. 2d 454 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
468 So. 2d 1066, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mori-v-industrial-leasing-corp-fladistctapp-1985.