Morgner v. Kister

42 Mo. 466
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided March 15, 1868·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Eagg, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

There are many defects in the steps taken to bring this cause here by writ of error. Passing over these, however, it is apparent from the record that there was no motion in the court below either for a new trial or in arrest of judgment. According to the former decisions of this court, an opportunity should have been given to the Circuit Court to correct its own errors ; and a failure to do so is fatal to an application for a review of the proceedings here. (Banks v. Lades, 89 Mo. 406; Bishop v. Ransom, id. 416-17.)

Judgment affirmed.

The other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morgner v. Kister, 42 Mo. 466 (Mo. 1868).

42 Mo. 466 (Morgner v. Kister) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Goad
246 S.W. 917 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1922)
Lilly v. Menke
28 S.W. 643 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1894)
McIntire v. McIntire
80 Mo. 470 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1883)
Bevin v. Powell
11 Mo. App. 216 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1881)
Exchange National Bank v. Allen
68 Mo. 474 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1878)
Moran v. January
52 Mo. 523 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1873)