Morgan v. Williams

95 So. 611, 85 Fla. 219, 28 A.L.R. 1020, 1922 Fla. LEXIS 344
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 23, 1922·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This canse having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the order aforesaid, and briefs, and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said or[220] der of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Browne, C. J., and Taylor, Whitfield and West, J. J., concur. Ellis, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morgan v. Williams, 95 So. 611, 85 Fla. 219, 28 A.L.R. 1020, 1922 Fla. LEXIS 344 (Fla. 1922).

95 So. 611 (Morgan v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. Blumer
763 S.W.2d 242 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1988)
Rosen v. Hunter
227 So. 2d 689 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Aune v. Breneman
52 N.W.2d 483 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1952)
Pierce v. Pierce
89 P.2d 269 (Montana Supreme Court, 1939)
Weems v. State
141 So. 215 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1932)