Home/Supreme Court of Florida/Morgan v. Williams

Morgan v. Williams

95 So. 611, 85 Fla. 219, 28 A.L.R. 1020, 1922 Fla. LEXIS 344
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 23, 1922
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 95 So. 611 (Morgan v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morgan v. Williams, 95 So. 611, 85 Fla. 219, 28 A.L.R. 1020, 1922 Fla. LEXIS 344 (Fla. 1922).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This canse having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the order aforesaid, and briefs, and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said or[220]*220der of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Browne, C. J., and Taylor, Whitfield and West, J. J., concur. Ellis, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. Blumer
763 S.W.2d 242 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1988)
Rosen v. Hunter
227 So. 2d 689 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Aune v. Breneman
52 N.W.2d 483 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1952)
Pierce v. Pierce
89 P.2d 269 (Montana Supreme Court, 1939)
Weems v. State
141 So. 215 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 So. 611, 85 Fla. 219, 28 A.L.R. 1020, 1922 Fla. LEXIS 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morgan-v-williams-fla-1922.