Morgan v. Susino Construction Co.
This text of 36 A.2d 604 (Morgan v. Susino Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for tlie reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Chief Justice in the Supreme Court; reserving, however, any expression as to the rights of an unborn child not within the *330 statutory provision. See Stemmer v. Kline, 128 N. J. L. 455.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Case, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Dear, Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 10.
For reversal — Heiier, Wells, Raeeerty, JJ. 3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 A.2d 604, 131 N.J.L. 329, 1944 N.J. LEXIS 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morgan-v-susino-construction-co-nj-1944.