Morgan v. State

364 S.W.3d 265, 2012 WL 1332579, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 465

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James D. Morgan appeals from the motion court’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order (judgment) denying his Rule 29.15 Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct the Judgment or Sentence after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential or precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the motion court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).