HITTLER v. State

364 S.W.3d 265, 2012 WL 1332613, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 468
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 10, 2012
DocketED 96971
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 364 S.W.3d 265 (HITTLER v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
HITTLER v. State, 364 S.W.3d 265, 2012 WL 1332613, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 468 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Hittler (“Hittler”) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Charles County, the Honorable Daniel G. Pelikan presiding. A jury convicted Hitt-ler of driving while intoxicated, and he had previously pled guilty to driving with a revoked license. The trial court sentenced him to concurrent terms of five years and one year, respectively, in the department of corrections.

*266 On appeal, Hittler argued that the circuit court erred in denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs and the Record on Appeal, and find no error of law in this case. Thus, a written opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morgan v. State
364 S.W.3d 265 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
364 S.W.3d 265, 2012 WL 1332613, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hittler-v-state-moctapp-2012.