Morgan v. Reintzel

11 U.S. 273, 3 L. Ed. 340, 7 Cranch 273, 1812 U.S. LEXIS 393
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 13, 1812·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Marshall, Ch. J.

after stating the case, observed that the Court could see no error in the judgment.

The payment of the money by the Plaintiff, under the circumstances stated in the count, was a sufficient consideration for the assumpsit.

The principal objection was that the count ought to have been founded upon the mote, so as to oblige the Plaintiff to produce it on the trial. But it states that *276 the note was paid by the Plaintiff: and the Court5' thinks that the note must have been produced upon the trial.

Judgment affirmed,.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morgan v. Reintzel, 11 U.S. 273, 3 L. Ed. 340, 7 Cranch 273, 1812 U.S. LEXIS 393 (1812).

11 U.S. 273 (Morgan v. Reintzel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Joe Louis Grant v. United States
307 F.2d 509 (Tenth Circuit, 1962)
Shall v. Newberry
234 F. 792 (N.D. New York, 1916)
Roach v. Hulings
41 U.S. 319 (Supreme Court, 1842)
Doughty v. Hildt
7 F. Cas. 965 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio, 1838)
Morse v. Bellows
7 N.H. 549 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1835)
Reintzel v. Morgan
20 F. Cas. 509 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia, 1810)