Joe Louis Grant v. United States

307 F.2d 509
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedAugust 22, 1962
Docket6891_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 307 F.2d 509 (Joe Louis Grant v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joe Louis Grant v. United States, 307 F.2d 509 (10th Cir. 1962).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the judgment and sentence imposed pursuant to appellant’s conviction on three counts alleging violations of the United States narcotics laws. (21 U.S.C.A. § 174; 26 U.S.C.A. § 4704(a); and, 26 U.S.C.A. § 4705(a).)

Appellant received concurrent sentences of eight, four and eight years respectively on the three counts of the indictment. The sentences on counts two and three are conceded to be valid and appellant urges only that his conviction on count one is unsupported by sufficient evidence. It is well established, however, that where a defendant has been convicted on several counts, a judgment and sentence will not be reversed if the sentence does not exceed that which was lawfully imposed on any one count. See: Marteney v. United States (10 C.A.), 218 F.2d 258, 261, cert. den. 348 U.S. 953, 75 S.Ct. 442, 99 L.Ed. 745, and cases there cited. Cf. Greene v. United States, 358 U.S. 326, 79 S.Ct. 340, 3 L.Ed. 340, and Travis v. United States (10 C.A.), 269 F.2d 928.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Willard Wilson Wood v. United States
357 F.2d 425 (Tenth Circuit, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
307 F.2d 509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joe-louis-grant-v-united-states-ca10-1962.