Morgan v. Gay

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
• Decided: October 16, 2006
• Docket: 06-8045
• Status: Published

Opinion

Opinions of the United 2006 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

10-16-2006

Morgan v. Gay Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 06-8045

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006

Recommended Citation "Morgan v. Gay" (2006). 2006 Decisions. Paper 260. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006/260

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2006 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

Case No: 06-8045

SARAH MORGAN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated

v.

DENNIS W. GAY; GINA GAY; BASIC RESEARCH, L.L.C.; BAN, L.L.C.; KLEIN-BECKER, USA L.L.C.; COVAXIL LABORATORIES, L.L.C.; CARTER-REED COMPANY, L.L.C., a/k/a THE CARTER-REED COMPANY; A.G. WATERHOUSE, L.L.C.; ALPHAGENBO TECH, L.L.C.; BODY FORUM, L.L.C.; BODY INNOVENTIONS, L.L.C.; COVARIX, L.L.C.; BYDEX MANAGEMENT, L.L.C.; NUTRASPORT, L.L.C; SOVAGE DERMALOGIC LABORATORIES, L.L.C.; WESTERN HOLDING, L.L.C.; GEORGE EVAN BYBEE; DANIEL B. MOWREY, Ph.D; NATHALIE CHEVREAU, Ph.D; MITCHELL K. FRIEDLANDER; MICAHEL MEADE,

Petitioners

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey District Court No.-06-cv-01371 District Judge: The Honorable Garrett E. Brown, Jr.

Submitted September 7, 2006

Before: BARRY, SMITH, and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges __________________________

ORDER ______________________________

This cause came to be heard on a Petition for Leave to Appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1453(c) from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey and

was submitted on August 16, 2006. On consideration thereof, it is now ORDERED that

Defendants’ Petition for Leave to Appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1453(c) is granted. All of the

above in accordance with the opinion of this Court.

ATTEST:

/s/ D. Brooks Smith_____________ Circuit Judge

Dated: October 16, 2006