Morgan v. Decker
Opinion
Appellant asserts that the trial court committed reversible error during the trial by admitting evidence of appellant’s settlement agreement with another defendant and by denying appellant’s motions for mistrial and new trial after defense counsel mischaracterized the settlement agreement during opening statement. We agree that reversal is required by the recent decision in Saleeby v. Rocky Elson Construction, Inc., 3 So.3d 1078 (Fla.2009), which was issued after the appeal was taken in this case. Accordingly, we reverse the final judgment and remand for a new trial.
REVERSED and REMANDED with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
23 So. 3d 201 (Morgan v. Decker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.