Moreno-Gratini v. Sticht

Opinion

[lps eyetr ery 2). SC PRONICALLY PILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT POS nt SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE PILE | ¢ [aoa | MERLIN MORENO-ORATIN, Plaintiff, 19 CIVIL 5964 (GHW) -against- JUDGMENT THOMAS STICHT, Defendant. penne nee ee eee

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated May 5, 2022, the R&R is adopted with respect to Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus. For the reasons articulated in the R&R, Petitioner Merlin Moreno-Gratini's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). Judgment is entered for Respondent; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York May 6, 2022 RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerkof Court BY: