Morejon v. Batan

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Morejon v. Batan

891 So. 2d 1194, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 986, 2005 WL 235972

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 2, 2005

DocketNo. 3D04-572

StatusPublished

This text of 891 So. 2d 1194 (Morejon v. Batan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morejon v. Batan, 891 So. 2d 1194, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 986, 2005 WL 235972 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Remberto Morejon, Jr., appeals a final judgment of paternity, and amendment thereto. We conclude that the child custody determination is supported by competent substantial evidence. See Rogers v. Brown, 884 So.2d 523 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); Calam v. Calam, 752 So.2d 722 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). The trial court resolved the conflicting testimony of the parties in favor of the appellee mother. This court is not permitted to reweigh the evidence. See Rogers; Zalis v. Zalis, 498 So.2d 505, 506 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).

The visitation schedule was within the trial court’s discretion to order. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980). The trial court’s denial of retroactive support is likewise supported by the record.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Remberto Morejon, Jr., appeals a final judgment of paternity, and amendment thereto. We conclude that the child custody determination is supported by competent substantial evidence. See Rogers v. Brown, 884 So.2d 523 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); Calam v. Calam, 752 So.2d 722 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). The trial court resolved the conflicting testimony of the parties in favor of the appellee mother. This court is not permitted to reweigh the evidence. See Rogers; Zalis v. Zalis, 498 So.2d 505, 506 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).

The visitation schedule was within the trial court’s discretion to order. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980). The trial court’s denial of retroactive support is likewise supported by the record.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

891 So. 2d 1194, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 986, 2005 WL 235972, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morejon-v-batan-fladistctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack