Calam v. Calam

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Calam v. Calam

752 So. 2d 722, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2801, 2000 WL 276369

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 15, 2000

DocketNo. 3D99-1339

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 752 So. 2d 722 (Calam v. Calam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Calam v. Calam, 752 So. 2d 722, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2801, 2000 WL 276369 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Aleñe M. Calam appeals an order modifying custody. The procedural rulings complained about by the appellant mother were within the discretion of the master and trial court, respectively. Assuming arguendo that there was any procedural error, it was cured by the trial court when it granted the mother’s exceptions and reheard the case.

The order granting a change of custody of the son is supported by competent substantial evidence and is in accord with the [723]*723applicable legal standards. See Teller v. Richert, 744 So.2d 1230, 1231-32 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Laskey v. Peeler, 704 So.2d 1066, 1067 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), review denied, 717 So.2d 534 (Fla.1998).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Aleñe M. Calam appeals an order modifying custody. The procedural rulings complained about by the appellant mother were within the discretion of the master and trial court, respectively. Assuming arguendo that there was any procedural error, it was cured by the trial court when it granted the mother’s exceptions and reheard the case.

The order granting a change of custody of the son is supported by competent substantial evidence and is in accord with the [723]*723applicable legal standards. See Teller v. Richert, 744 So.2d 1230, 1231-32 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Laskey v. Peeler, 704 So.2d 1066, 1067 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), review denied, 717 So.2d 534 (Fla.1998).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

752 So. 2d 722, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2801, 2000 WL 276369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calam-v-calam-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack