Calam v. Calam

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Calam v. Calam

752 So. 2d 722, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2801, 2000 WL 276369

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 15, 2000·No. No. 3D99-1339·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Aleñe M. Calam appeals an order modifying custody. The procedural rulings complained about by the appellant mother were within the discretion of the master and trial court, respectively. Assuming arguendo that there was any procedural error, it was cured by the trial court when it granted the mother’s exceptions and reheard the case.

The order granting a change of custody of the son is supported by competent substantial evidence and is in accord with the [723] applicable legal standards. See Teller v. Richert, 744 So.2d 1230, 1231-32 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Laskey v. Peeler, 704 So.2d 1066, 1067 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), review denied, 717 So.2d 534 (Fla.1998).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Aleñe M. Calam appeals an order modifying custody. The procedural rulings complained about by the appellant mother were within the discretion of the master and trial court, respectively. Assuming arguendo that there was any procedural error, it was cured by the trial court when it granted the mother’s exceptions and reheard the case.

The order granting a change of custody of the son is supported by competent substantial evidence and is in accord with the [723] applicable legal standards. See Teller v. Richert, 744 So.2d 1230, 1231-32 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Laskey v. Peeler, 704 So.2d 1066, 1067 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), review denied, 717 So.2d 534 (Fla.1998).

Affirmed.

Calam v. Calam, 752 So. 2d 722, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2801, 2000 WL 276369 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

752 So. 2d 722 (Calam v. Calam) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related