Morales v. State

636 So. 2d 864, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4522, 1994 WL 176721
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 10, 1994
DocketNo. 93-1274
StatusPublished

This text of 636 So. 2d 864 (Morales v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morales v. State, 636 So. 2d 864, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4522, 1994 WL 176721 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Claudio Morales appeals from a judgment of conviction for trafficking in cocaine. We affirm.

It affirmatively appears from the record that there was abundant evidence from which the trial court could conclude that the confidential informant was reliable. Thus, the informant’s continuous telephonic report to police officers describing the cocaine, the truck and the driver furnished more than sufficient probable cause for the stop and seizure of the cocaine and money. See McKee v. State, 430 So.2d 983 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 437 So.2d 677 (Fla.1983); State v. Hetland, 366 So.2d 831 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979), approved, 387 So.2d 963 (Fla.1980). Morales’ remaining points on appeal are without merit.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hetland
366 So. 2d 831 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Hetland v. State
387 So. 2d 963 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
636 So. 2d 864, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4522, 1994 WL 176721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morales-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.