Morales v. State

622 So. 2d 1173, 1993 WL 331419
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 31, 1993·No. 93-476·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

622 So.2d 1173 (1993)

Jose MORALES, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 93-476.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

August 31, 1993.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Louis Campbell, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Richard L. Polin, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Gracian A. Celaya, Certified Legal Intern, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, COPE and GODERICH, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal questions the propriety of an order revoking the appellant's probation. The state has conceded that the trial court's order finding a violation of condition two and conditions ten through fourteen *1174 was in error. This leaves only the finding of the violation of condition one as a subject matter to be further considered. We have examined the record and find no error in determining that there was a violation of condition one which required monthly reports and which alone justifies the revocation of probation. Therefore, we first strike from the order the finding of violations as to condition two, and conditions ten through fourteen, and second, finding no error as to the violation of condition one, we affirm the order revoking the probation as amended.

Affirmed as amended.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morales v. State, 622 So. 2d 1173, 1993 WL 331419 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

622 So. 2d 1173 (Morales v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. State
19 So. 3d 1007 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Alvarez v. State
638 So. 2d 992 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Hall v. State
625 So. 2d 1310 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)