Morales v. Morales

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Morales v. Morales

697 So. 2d 1311, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9470, 1997 WL 484813

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 20, 1997

DocketNo. 96-3495

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 697 So. 2d 1311 (Morales v. Morales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morales v. Morales, 697 So. 2d 1311, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9470, 1997 WL 484813 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the record does not contain substantial competent evidence supporting the trial court’s conclusion that the ex-wife is in need of an alimony award and that the ex-husband has the ability to pay such an award, we reverse that portion of the Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage awarding permanent periodic alimony to the ex-wife. Heilman v. Heilman, 610 So.2d 60 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). The remainder of the final judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Because the record does not contain substantial competent evidence supporting the trial court’s conclusion that the ex-wife is in need of an alimony award and that the ex-husband has the ability to pay such an award, we reverse that portion of the Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage awarding permanent periodic alimony to the ex-wife. Heilman v. Heilman, 610 So.2d 60 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). The remainder of the final judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

697 So. 2d 1311, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9470, 1997 WL 484813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morales-v-morales-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack