Morales v. Morales
697 So. 2d 1311, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9470, 1997 WL 484813
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 20, 1997·No. No. 96-3495·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Because the record does not contain substantial competent evidence supporting the trial court’s conclusion that the ex-wife is in need of an alimony award and that the ex-husband has the ability to pay such an award, we reverse that portion of the Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage awarding permanent periodic alimony to the ex-wife. Heilman v. Heilman, 610 So.2d 60 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). The remainder of the final judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed in part; reversed in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Morales v. Morales, 697 So. 2d 1311, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9470, 1997 WL 484813 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
697 So. 2d 1311 (Morales v. Morales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Currier v. Currier
99 So. 3d 996 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Williams v. Williams
697 So. 2d 1311 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)