Currier v. Currier

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Currier v. Currier

99 So. 3d 996, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18754, 2012 WL 5273030

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 26, 2012·No. No. 5D11-4283·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse that portion of the final judgment of dissolution of marriage awarding the former wife permanent periodic alimony because the record does not contain competent, substantial evidence of the former husband’s ability to pay such an award. Morales v. Morales, 697 So.2d 1311 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). We also reverse the corresponding restriction on the former husband’s guardian’s access to his Bank of St. Augustine account to pay anything but permanent alimony. We affirm the remainder of the final judgment.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.

PALMER and JACOBUS, JJ., and WETHERELL, T. KENT, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse that portion of the final judgment of dissolution of marriage awarding the former wife permanent periodic alimony because the record does not contain competent, substantial evidence of the former husband’s ability to pay such an award. Morales v. Morales, 697 So.2d 1311 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). We also reverse the corresponding restriction on the former husband’s guardian’s access to his Bank of St. Augustine account to pay anything but permanent alimony. We affirm the remainder of the final judgment.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.

PALMER and JACOBUS, JJ., and WETHERELL, T. KENT, Associate Judge, concur.

Currier v. Currier, 99 So. 3d 996, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18754, 2012 WL 5273030 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

99 So. 3d 996 (Currier v. Currier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related