Morales v. Local 32BJ
This text of Morales v. Local 32BJ (Morales v. Local 32BJ) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK [UCIAA MORALES. SSS™S™~S~S~S~S Plaintiff, 22 CIVIL 8700 (OTW) -against- JUDGMENT LOCAL 32BJ, et al. Defendants. eK
It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated March 25, 2024, Defendants’ motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 31 and 34) are GRANTED. Although pro se complaints should generally be given leave to amend when there is “any indication that a valid claim might be stated," Thompson v. Carter, 284 F.3d 411, 416 (2d Cir. 2002), amendment may be denied upon a finding of futility. See Chill v. Gen. Elec. Co., 101 F.3d 263, 27172 (2d Cir. 1996). Here, Plaintiff has not pleaded either element of her hybrid claim and has pleaded facts that would make it impossible for her to do so. Accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York March 25, 2024 RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court
BY: ER Deputy Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Morales v. Local 32BJ, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morales-v-local-32bj-nysd-2024.