Morales-Gutierrez v. Holder

361 F. App'x 863
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 8, 2010
Docket07-71984
StatusUnpublished

This text of 361 F. App'x 863 (Morales-Gutierrez v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morales-Gutierrez v. Holder, 361 F. App'x 863 (9th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Alfredo Morales-Gutierrez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s continuous physical presence determination. Lopez-Alvarado v. Ashcroft, 381 F.3d 847, 850-51 (9th Cir.2004). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s conclusion that Morales-Gutierrez did not meet his burden of establishing continuous physical presence, see 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l)(A), because his testimony was internally inconsistent and was inconsistent with his witness’ testimony about Morales-Gutierrez’s entry date, addresses, and employment for the requisite time period. Cf. Vera-Villegas v. INS, 330 F.3d 1222, 1231-34 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
361 F. App'x 863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morales-gutierrez-v-holder-ca9-2010.