Mora v. Maass

Oregon Supreme Court

Mora v. Maass

877 P.2d 641, 319 Or. 570, 1994 Ore. LEXIS 76

DecidedAugust 11, 1994

DocketCC 91C-10360; CA A71969; CC 91C-11530; CA A71954; SC S40263; CC 91C-11061; CA A71982; CC 91C-10445; CA A71983; SC S40286

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 877 P.2d 641 (Mora v. Maass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mora v. Maass, 877 P.2d 641, 319 Or. 570, 1994 Ore. LEXIS 76 (Or. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

affirmed by an equally divided court August 11,

reconsideration denied October 18, 1994

[571]*571Mark J. Geiger, Salem, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner on review James Anthony Craiger.

Ronald M. Hellewell, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review Joaquin S. Teran.

Janet A. Metcalf, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review. With her on a response to the petitions were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI